California Right to Information Lawyer – Demand Trust Information Under Probate Code § 16061

As a trust beneficiary, you have the right to demand information under Probate Code § 16061. If a trustee refuses, we file a § 17200 petition to compel. San Diego trust litigation attorney.

“Key Takeaways”

• Two Different Information Rights: Under Probate Code § 16061.7, you have the right to receive a copy of the trust instrument. Under § 16061, you may request other trust information.
• 60‑Day Rule with a Six‑Month Limitation: Under Probate Code § 17200(b)(7)(B), you may petition to compel only if the trustee fails to respond within 60 days and you have not received the information in the six months before your request.
• Roth v. Jelley (2025) – No Notice, No Clock: The Court of Appeal held that the 120‑day trust contest period and statutes of limitation do not begin if the trustee never served statutory notice of the trust’s existence or irrevocability. This is a powerful tool but not a blanket “infinite time” rule.
• San Diego Local Rules 4.3.1 & 4.11: Your petition must comply with formatting rules (Local Rule 4.3.1) and include a declaration detailing the request and the trustee’s response (Local Rule 4.11). We pre‑clear examiner notes using a strict checklist.
• Electronic Service Agreement Strategy: Include an “Electronic Service Agreement” in your initial demand letter. Under Probate Code § 1215, this allows email service and triggers faster deadlines without requiring separate written consent later.

Full Pillar Page

California Right to Information Lawyer – Petition to Compel Trust Information San Diego

Quick Answer: As a trust beneficiary, you have two powerful information rights. First, under Probate Code § 16061.7, the trustee must give you a complete copy of the trust instrument upon request. Second, under § 16061, you may demand other trust‑related information (e.g., financial records, transaction details). If the trustee refuses or fails to respond within 60 days – and you haven’t received that information in the prior six months – we file a Petition to Compel Trust Information under § 17200(b)(7)(B). The court will order compliance, impose sanctions, and award attorney fees.

1. Two Distinct Statutes: § 16061.7 (Trust Terms) vs. § 16061 (General Information)

Quick Answer: Section 16061.7 gives you the right to receive the “terms of the trust” – the actual trust document, including all amendments and schedules. Section 16061 gives you the right to request other information “relating to the administration of the trust relevant to your interest,” such as financial statements, tax returns, and distribution records.

Section 16061.7 – The Trust Instrument Itself:
Under Probate Code § 16061.7, upon request, the trustee must provide a complete copy of the trust instrument to any beneficiary of an irrevocable trust. This includes all amendments, restatements, and any documents that define the trust’s terms. The trustee cannot redact or withhold portions, except for extremely limited circumstances (e.g., no‑contest clauses that would be triggered, but even then, a redacted copy must be provided).

Section 16061 – Other Trust Information:
Under Probate Code § 16061, the trustee must respond to “reasonable requests” for information relating to trust administration that is relevant to your interest. This includes bank statements, brokerage account records, canceled checks, tax returns, and distribution ledgers.

Strategic note: We always send two separate demands: one under § 16061.7 for the trust instrument, and another under § 16061 for specific financial documents. This creates two independent deadlines and enforcement pathways. At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we never allow a trustee to hide behind “the information you requested is in the trust document” – we demand both.

2. The 60‑Day Rule and the Six‑Month Limitation (§ 17200(b)(7)(B))

Quick Answer: Under Probate Code § 17200(b)(7)(B), you may file a petition to compel information only if the trustee fails to provide the requested information within 60 days of your written request AND the beneficiary has not received the information within the six months preceding the request. This six‑month limitation is a common trap – if the trustee provided incomplete information five months ago, you may need to wait or reframe your request.

Why the six‑month limitation matters:
Suppose the trustee sent an incomplete bank statement (missing three months) five months ago. Under § 17200(b)(7)(B), you cannot petition to compel for that same information because you received some information (even if incomplete) within the prior six months. However, you can send a new, more specific request that asks for the missing months explicitly. That new request resets the clock.

Step‑by‑step process to avoid the six‑month trap:

Milestone	Action
Initial request	Be specific. List exact documents and date ranges.
Trustee responds (even partially)	If incomplete, send a follow‑up request identifying exactly what is missing.
Wait 60 days from the follow‑up request	The six‑month limitation now applies to the follow‑up request, not the original.
File petition	Only if the trustee fails to provide the missing information within 60 days and you have not received that specific information in the prior six months.

Example calculation:
On January 1, you request bank statements for 2023. The trustee provides statements for January–June only, omitting July–December. You received some information within six months, so you cannot petition immediately. Instead, on February 1, you send a new request for the July–December statements only. The six‑month limitation now runs from February 1. If the trustee fails to provide the missing statements by April 1 (60 days later) and you have not received those specific statements in the six months before April 1, you may file a petition.

At Leeran S. Barzilai, we track every request and response meticulously. We calendar both the 60‑day deadline and the six‑month lookback period to ensure we never file a petition prematurely – which would trigger examiner notes and delays.

3. San Diego Local Rules: 4.3.1 (Form of Papers) and 4.11 (Petitions to Compel)

Quick Answer: San Diego Superior Court Probate Local Rules require that petitions to compel information comply with Local Rule 4.3.1 (formatting: 12‑point font, 1.5 line spacing, case number on every page) and Local Rule 4.11 (petitions to compel must include a declaration describing the request, the trustee’s response, and why it is inadequate). Local Rule 4.13 governs accountings – not information petitions.

Local Rule 4.3.1 – Form of Papers:
All documents filed in the Probate Division must use 12‑point font, 1.5 line spacing, and include the case number on the first page and all continuation pages. Margins must be at least one inch. Failure to follow this rule results in an examiner note and a delay of 2‑4 months.

Local Rule 4.11 – Petitions to Compel:
This rule specifically governs petitions to compel information or accountings under Probate Code § 17200. Your petition must include:

• A copy of the written request for information
• Proof of service of the request
• A declaration from the beneficiary (or attorney) detailing the trustee’s response or lack thereof
• An explanation of why the response (if any) is inadequate
• A proposed order compelling the trustee to provide the information within a specific deadline (usually 30 days)

How we pre‑clear examiner notes:
We maintain an internal checklist based on Local Rules 4.3.1 and 4.11. Before filing, we verify:

• Font size, spacing, and margins
• Case number on every page
• Request attached and proof of service included
• Declaration signed under penalty of perjury
• Proposed order included and formatted correctly

Because we pre‑clear examiner notes, most of our petitions go directly to hearing without delay. We have never had a petition rejected for formatting errors.

Where to file:
San Diego Superior Court, Probate Division, Central Courthouse, 1100 Union Street, Third Floor, San Diego, CA 92101. E‑filing is mandatory through the Odyssey system.

4. Roth v. Jelley (2025) – No Notice, No Clock (But Not a Blanket Shield)

Quick Answer: In Roth v. Jelley (2025), the Court of Appeal held that when a trustee fails to serve the statutory notice of the trust’s existence or irrevocability (under § 16061.7), the 120‑day trust contest period and certain statutes of limitation never begin to run. This does not mean all claims are indefinite – only those dependent on that specific notice.

What the case actually says:
George Roth passed away in 1985. His son Jeff never received the formal notice required by California law that the trust had become irrevocable. Decades later, Jeff sued for breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court dismissed the claims as time‑barred. The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that because the trustee never provided the legally required notice, the limitations period never started.

What the case does NOT say:

• It does not eliminate all statutes of limitation for all breaches. If a trustee provides proper notice, the 120‑day contest period and three‑year limitations under § 16460 apply.
• It does not apply to claims unrelated to the trust’s existence (e.g., a specific improper distribution made after proper notice was given).

How we use Roth v. Jelley strategically:
When a trustee refuses to provide the trust instrument under § 16061.7, they are also failing to give the statutory notice required by § 16061.7(a) – which triggers Roth v. Jelley. We send a demand letter citing the case, warning that the trustee’s refusal means the statute of limitations never starts. This often compels immediate compliance.

At Leeran S. Barzilai, we have used Roth to obtain trust documents that trustees had withheld for years. The case is a powerful tool – but only in the right circumstances.

5. The 2026 Electronic Service Agreement Strategy

Quick Answer: Under Probate Code § 1215, electronic service (email) requires the trustee’s prior written consent. To avoid delay, many San Diego practitioners now include an “Electronic Service Agreement” in their initial demand letter. The beneficiary signs the agreement, and the letter asks the trustee to sign as well. Once signed, all future requests and petitions may be served by email, triggering faster deadlines.

Why this matters:
Personal service or certified mail can take days or weeks. Email service is instantaneous. Under § 1215, once both parties consent in writing, service by email is as valid as personal service. The 60‑day clock starts the moment the email is sent.

How to implement the strategy:
Include the following language in your initial demand letter:

“Pursuant to Probate Code § 1215, the undersigned beneficiary consents to electronic service of all future requests, notices, and petitions. We request that the trustee also consent to electronic service by signing below. A copy of this signed agreement will be filed with the court.”

Even if the trustee refuses to sign, you have established that you are ready for electronic service – and you can later petition the court to order electronic service if the trustee is using mail delays strategically.

At Leeran S. Barzilai, we use this strategy in every initial demand. It eliminates the “the mail was delayed” excuse and accelerates the entire process.

6. What If the Trustee Refuses? Filing a Petition to Compel Under § 17200

Quick Answer: If the trustee fails to provide the requested information within 60 days of your written request – and you have not received that information in the six months before your request – you may file a Petition to Compel Trust Information under Probate Code § 17200(b)(7)(B). The court will order the trustee to produce the information, impose sanctions, and award your attorney fees.

Litigation timeline for a contested information demand:

Milestone	Deadline	Action Required
Send written information request	Day 0	Cite § 16061 or § 16061.7. Be specific. Include electronic service agreement.
Trustee’s response period	Days 1‑60	Trustee must respond or provide information.
Verify six‑month lookback	Day 60	Confirm you have not received the requested information in the prior six months.
File Petition to Compel	Day 61 (if no compliance and six‑month condition met)	E‑file at Central Courthouse under § 17200(b)(7)(B).
Court sets hearing	Usually 60‑90 days after filing	Receive hearing date from Probate Department 43.
Serve petition on trustee	At least 30 days before hearing	Use licensed San Diego process server (or email if consent obtained).
Trustee files response	15 days before hearing	If no response, seek default order.
Court hearing	As scheduled	Judge orders information + sanctions + attorney fees.

What the court can order:

• Immediate production of the requested information within a specific deadline (typically 30 days)
• Monetary sanctions against the trustee (payable to the court or to you)
• Attorney fees under § 17200 (we recover our fees from the trustee)
• In egregious cases, removal of the trustee under § 17200(b)(10)

7. Multi‑Modal Element: Downloadable Checklist – “6‑Step Trust Information Demand Checklist”

Instead of a video script, we provide a text‑based infographic that users can download or print.

1 – Identify Your Right – Confirm you are a beneficiary under Probate Code § 24 (includes any person with a present or future interest in the trust).

2 – Choose the Correct Statute – For the trust instrument itself, cite § 16061.7. For other information (bank statements, tax returns, etc.), cite § 16061.

3 – Draft the Demand Letter – Include: date, trustee’s name and address, citation to the correct statute, specific description of requested information, 60‑day deadline, warning of petition under § 17200(b)(7)(B), and an electronic service agreement.

4 – Serve the Demand – Use certified mail (return receipt) plus email if the trustee signs the electronic service agreement. Keep proof of delivery. Note: Without consent, email service is not valid.

5 – Calendar the Deadline and Check the Six‑Month Lookback – Mark 60 days from service date. Also verify that you have not received the requested information in the six months before your request. If you have, send a new, narrower request.

6 – File Petition to Compel – If no response after 60 days and the six‑month condition is met, e‑file at San Diego Central Courthouse (1100 Union St.) under § 17200(b)(7)(B). Use our Local Rules 4.3.1 and 4.11 checklist to avoid examiner notes.

8. Internal Semantic Silo (Related Sub‑pages)

This pillar page is part of our Trust Litigation series. Use these internal links for topic clustering:

• California Right to Information Lawyer (Pillar Page)
• California Right to Accounting Lawyer
• Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawyer San Diego
• San Diego Trust Contest Attorney

• California Right to Accounting Lawyer – Demand a Trust or Estate Accounting in San Diego
• Privacy Policy
• Summary of Attorney-Client Agreement
• About 2
• What to Do After a Car Accident in California: Your 24-Hour Legal Checklist

FAQ Section

Contact Our Office – Free Consultation

Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp.
4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c, San Diego, CA 92109
(619) 436-7544
info@lbatlaw.com

We are located directly across from Mission Bay, minutes from the Central Courthouse (1100 Union St.). We offer free, no‑obligation consultations and work on a contingency fee basis – you pay nothing unless we recover.

If a trustee has refused your request for the trust instrument or other trust information, call us now. Under Roth v. Jelley, if the trustee never provided proper notice, your claims may not be time‑barred – but do not wait. Every day of delay makes evidence harder to find.

📞 (619) 436-7544 – We answer 24/7.

Subpages

1. Your Fundamental Right to Be Informed (Probate Code § 16060)

• Keywords: Beneficiary right to information, Probate Code 16060, Trust administration transparency.
• Description: Under California law, trustees have a “fundamental duty” to keep you reasonably informed. If you are being ignored, we cite § 16060 to force the disclosure of bank statements, tax returns, and asset valuations.

2. Demand a Copy of the Trust Document (§ 16061.7)

• Keywords: Request trust copy California, Probate Code 16061.7, Trust amendment disclosure.
• Description: You are legally entitled to a complete copy of the trust and all amendments. We handle the formal written demand and ensure you receive the full “terms of the trust” within the statutory 60-day window.

3. The 60-Day Deadline for Trustee Responses

• Keywords: Trustee response deadline, Compel trust information, Delayed trust distribution.
• Description: When a beneficiary makes a reasonable written request, the trustee has exactly 60 days to respond. If they fail, we petition the court to compel production and seek recovery of your attorney fees.

4. Petition to Compel Information (Probate Code § 17200)

• Keywords: Petition to compel trust information, Probate Code 17200, San Diego probate court.
• Description: When informal requests fail, a § 17200 petition is your strongest weapon. We ask the court to intervene, settle accounts, and order the trustee to produce all records relevant to your interest.

5. Overriding Trust Accounting Waivers

• Keywords: Waived trust accounting, Probate Code 16064, Material breach of trust.
• Description: Many trusts claim to “waive” the duty to account. However, under § 16064, if we show a “material breach” is likely, the court can override the waiver and force a full financial disclosure.

6. No Notice Means No Time Limit (Roth v. Jelley)

• Keywords: Roth v. Jelley case, Trust statute of limitations, Improper trust notice.
• Description: Recent 2026 legal standards clarify that if a trustee fails to provide proper statutory notice, your right to sue for breach of trust may be unlimited. We use this precedent to reopen “closed” cases.

7. Information Rights for Future & Remainder Beneficiaries

• Keywords: Remainder beneficiary rights, Future interest trust, Contingent beneficiary information.
• Description: Even if you don’t receive money today, you have a right to protect your future interest. We help remainder beneficiaries monitor trust assets to ensure the current trustee isn’t draining the estate.

8. Strategic Discovery: Beyond Formal Accountings

• Keywords: Trust discovery tools, Subpoena trust records, Depose a trustee.
• Description: Sometimes an accounting isn’t enough. We use civil discovery—including subpoenas and depositions—to find what a trustee is hiding in internal memos and correspondence with advisors.

9. Rights of “Putative” Beneficiaries in Trust Contests

• Keywords: Putative beneficiary rights, Trust contest information, Disinherited heir rights.
• Description: Just because an amendment says you are no longer a beneficiary doesn’t mean you lose your right to information. We assert your standing to obtain the records needed to challenge a suspicious amendment.

10. Trustee Removal for Withholding Information

• Keywords: Remove trustee for cause, Breach of fiduciary duty, Trustee non-disclosure.
• Description: Repeated failure to provide information is a breach of fiduciary duty. We petition the San Diego Probate Court to suspend or remove trustees who refuse to operate with transparency.

---

Chinese (中文) 子页面

1. 受益人的基本知情权 (遗嘱法第 16060 条)

• 关键词： 受益人知情权, 加州遗嘱法 16060, 信托管理透明度。
• 描述： 根据加州法律，受托人有“基本义务”让您了解情况。如果受托人无视您的要求，我们将引用第 16060 条强制披露银行账单、纳税申报表和资产估值。

2. 索取信托文件副本 (§ 16061.7)

• 关键词： 索取信托副本, 遗嘱法 16061.7, 信托修正案披露。
• 描述： 您有权获得信托及其所有修正案的完整副本。我们协助您进行正式书面要求，确保在 60 天法定窗口期内收到完整的“信托条款”。

3. 受托人回复的 60 天期限

• 关键词： 受托人回复期限, 强制获取信托信息, 延迟信托分配。
• 描述： 当受益人提出合理的书面请求时，受托人必须在 60 天内回复。若其失败，我们将向法院申请强制执行，并为您追回律师费。

4. 强制披露信息申请 (遗嘱法第 17200 条)

• 关键词： 强制信托信息申请, 遗嘱法 17200, 圣地亚哥遗嘱认证法院。
• 描述： 当非正式请求无效时，第 17200 条申请是您的最强武器。我们请求法院介入，并命令受托人提供与您的权益相关的所有记录。

5. 撤销信托审计豁免

• 关键词： 豁免信托审计, 遗嘱法 16064, 重大违反信托行为。
• 描述： 许多信托声称“豁免”审计义务。但根据第 16064 条，如果我们证明可能存在“重大违约”，法院可以推翻豁免并强制进行完整的财务披露。

6. 无通知即无时限 (Roth v. Jelley 案例)

• 关键词： Roth v. Jelley 案例, 信托诉讼时效, 违规信托通知。
• 描述： 最新的 2026 年法律标准明确：如果受托人未能提供合法的法定通知，您起诉违约的权利可能是无限期的。我们利用此判例重新开启“已关闭”的案件。

7. 未来及剩余受益人的知情权

• 关键词： 剩余受益人权利, 未来利益信托, 或有受益人信息。
• 描述： 即使您今天没有拿到钱，您也有权保护未来的利益。我们帮助剩余受益人监控信托资产，确保当前受托人没有耗尽遗产。

8. 战略调查：超越正式审计

• 关键词： 信托调查工具, 传唤信托记录, 罢免受托人证词。
• 描述： 有时审计是不够的。我们利用民事调查手段（包括传票和证词）来发现受托人在内部备忘录和与顾问通信中隐藏的内容。

9. 信托争端中“推定”受益人的权利

• 关键词： 推定受益人权利, 信托争端信息, 被剥夺继承权的继承人权利。
• 描述： 仅仅因为修正案说您不再是受益人，并不意味着您失去了获取信息的权利。我们主张您的地位，以获取挑战可疑修正案所需的记录。

10. 因隐瞒信息罢免受托人

• 关键词： 依法罢免受托人, 违反信托义务, 受托人不披露。
• 描述： 反复拒绝提供信息属于违反信托义务。我们向圣地亚哥法院申请暂停或罢免拒绝透明运作的受托人。

---

Hebrew (עברית) תת-דפים

1. זכות היסוד שלך לקבלת מידע (סעיף 16060 לחוק הירושה)

• מילות מפתח: זכות המוטב למידע, סעיף 16060 לחוק הירושה, שקיפות בניהול נאמנות.
• תיאור: לפי חוקי קליפורניה, לנאמנים יש “חובת יסוד” לעדכן אתכם באופן סביר. אם מתעלמים מכם, אנו נסתמך על סעיף 16060 כדי לכפות חשיפת דפי בנק, דוחות מס והערכות שווי נכסים.

2. דרישת עותק ממסמכי הנאמנות (§ 16061.7)

• מילות מפתח: בקשת עותק נאמנות קליפורניה, סעיף 16061.7, חשיפת תיקוני נאמנות.
• תיאור: אתם זכאים על פי חוק לעותק מלא של הנאמנות וכל התיקונים שלה. אנו נטפל בדרישה הכתובה הרשמית ונבטיח שתקבלו את “תנאי הנאמנות” המלאים תוך 60 יום.

3. דדליין של 60 יום לתגובת הנאמן

• מילות מפתח: מועד אחרון לתגובת נאמן, כפיית מידע על נאמנות, עיכוב בחלוקת ירושה.
• תיאור: כאשר מוטב מגיש בקשה כתובה סבירה, לנאמן יש בדיוק 60 יום להגיב. אם יכשל, נגיש עתירה לבית המשפט לכפיית המצאת המסמכים ונדרוש החזר הוצאות שכר טרחת עורך דין.

4. עתירה לכפיית המצאת מידע (סעיף 17200)

• מילות מפתח: עתירה לכפיית מידע נאמנות, סעיף 17200, בית המשפט לענייני ירושה סן דייגו.
• תיאור: כשבקשות לא רשמיות נכשלות, עתירה לפי סעיף 17200 היא הכלי החזק ביותר שלכם. אנו נבקש מבית המשפט להתערב ולהורות לנאמן להמציא את כל הרשומות הרלוונטיות.

5. ביטול ויתור על מתן חשבונות בנאמנות

• מילות מפתח: ויתור על חשבונאות נאמנות, סעיף 16064, הפרה מהותית של נאמנות.
• תיאור: נאמנויות רבות טוענות ל”ויתור” על החובה למתן חשבונות. אולם, לפי סעיף 16064, אם נראה כי קיימת סבירות להפרה מהותית, בית המשפט יכול לבטל את הוויתור ולכפות חשיפה פיננסית מלאה.

6. ללא הודעה – אין הגבלת זמן (פסק דין Roth v. Jelley)

• מילות מפתח: פסק דין Roth v. Jelley, התיישנות בנאמנות, הודעה לא תקינה על נאמנות.
• תיאור: תקנים משפטיים חדשים מ-2026 מבהירים כי אם נאמן נכשל במתן הודעה סטטוטורית תקינה, זכותכם לתבוע על הפרת נאמנות עשויה להיות בלתי מוגבלת בזמן.

7. זכויות מידע למוטבים עתידיים ושאריתיים

• מילות מפתח: זכויות מוטב שאריתי, נאמנות עתידית, מידע למוטב מותנה.
• תיאור: גם אם אינכם מקבלים כסף היום, יש לכם זכות להגן על האינטרס העתידי שלכם. אנו עוזרים למוטבים שאריתיים לנטר את נכסי הנאמנות כדי להבטיח שהנאמן הנוכחי לא מרוקן את העיזבון.

8. גילוי מסמכים אסטרטגי: מעבר למתן חשבונות פורמלי

• מילות מפתח: כלי גילוי בנאמנות, צו המצאת רשומות, חקירת נאמן בשבועה.
• תיאור: לעיתים מתן חשבונות אינו מספיק. אנו משתמשים בכלי גילוי אזרחיים—כולל צווים וחקירות—כדי למצוא מה הנאמן מסתיר במזכרים פנימיים ובתכתובות עם יועצים.

9. זכויות של מוטבים “לכאורה” בסכסוכי נאמנות

• מילות מפתח: זכויות מוטב לכאורה, מידע בסכסוך נאמנות, זכויות יורש שנושל.
• תיאור: העובדה שתיקון לנאמנות טוען שאינכם עוד מוטבים אינה אומרת שאיבדתם את זכותכם למידע. אנו נלחם על מעמדכם לקבלת הרשומות הדרושות כדי לאתגר תיקון חשוד.

10. הדחת נאמן בגין הסתרת מידע

• מילות מפתח: הדחת נאמן מסיבה מוצדקת, הפרת חובת נאמנות, אי-חשיפת מידע ע”י נאמן.
• תיאור: כישלון חוזר באספקת מידע מהווה הפרה של חובת הנאמנות. אנו עותרים לבית המשפט בסן דייגו להשעיית או הדחת נאמנים המסרבים לפעול בשקיפות.

{ “@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “LegalService”, “name”: “Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp.”, “url”: “https://lbatlaw.com/california-right-to-information-lawyer-san-diego”, “telephone”: “+1-619-436-7544”, “email”: “info@lbatlaw.com”, “priceRange”: “$$ (Free consultation; contingency fees available)”, “address”: { “@type”: “PostalAddress”, “streetAddress”: “4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c”, “addressLocality”: “San Diego”, “addressRegion”: “CA”, “postalCode”: “92109”, “addressCountry”: “US” }, “geo”: { “@type”: “GeoCoordinates”, “latitude”: 32.7995, “longitude”: -117.2281 }, “openingHoursSpecification”: [ { “@type”: “OpeningHoursSpecification”, “dayOfWeek”: [“Monday”, “Tuesday”, “Wednesday”, “Thursday”, “Friday”, “Saturday”, “Sunday”], “opens”: “00:00”, “closes”: “23:59” } ], “sameAs”: [ “https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61586836011088”, “https://www.yelp.com/biz/leeran-s-barzilai-a-professional-law-corporation-san-diego-2”, “https://www.youtube.com/@LeeranBarzilaiLaw”, “https://www.linkedin.com/company/leeran-s-barzilai-a-prof-law-corp/”, “https://share.google/kDdrdIwUcZB9HmZin”, “https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92109-ca-leeran-barzilai-5006356.html”, “https://www.martindale.com/attorney/leeran-sean-barzilai-300440110” ], “knowsAbout”: [ “California right to information”, “Probate Code § 16061”, “Probate Code § 16061.7”, “Probate Code § 17200”, “Petition to Compel Trust Information”, “six‑month limitation”, “San Diego Local Rule 4.3.1”, “San Diego Local Rule 4.11”, “Roth v. Jelley 2025”, “electronic service agreement”, “San Diego Trust Beneficiary Lawyer” ], “hasCredential”: “State Bar of California, San Diego County Bar Association”, “areaServed”: { “@type”: “City”, “name”: “San Diego”, “containedInPlace”: { “@type”: “State”, “name”: “California” } } }