California Rideshare Accident Claims | [Insurance Code § 1158.05 Strategic Recovery]

Master California Uber & Lyft claims statewide. Learn how Insurance Code § 11580.1 applies to rideshare accidents in all 58 counties. Expert remote legal aid.

Key Takeaways

  • The 3-Period Rule: Coverage ranges from your personal policy to California’s $1 Million Mandatory Policy depending on the app’s status.
  • Statute of Limitations: You generally have two years from the date of the accident under CCP § 335.1, but notice requirements for government entities (if a bus was involved) are only 6 months.
  • Evidence is Digital: Success in 2026 depends on securing “Log-On/Log-Off” data, GPS pings, and telematics—not just a dashboard camera.
  • Statewide Access: We provide remote representation for underserved regions (Central Valley, Inland Empire, North Coast) using virtual consultations and eFiling.

California Rideshare Accident Claims: The Definitive 2026 Litigation Guide

Does the $1 Million Policy Apply to My Accident?

Quick Answer: The $1 million liability policy under Public Utilities Code § 5433 applies only during Period 3 (from the moment a driver accepts a ride request until the passenger exits). During Period 2 (app on, seeking ride), coverage is lower (typically $50k/$100k/$30k), and Period 1 (app off) relies entirely on the driver’s personal insurance.

Navigating the Coverage Tiers

At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we treat rideshare cases as “hybrid” litigation. Unlike a standard car wreck, we must first verify the electronic state of the driver.

  • Period 1 (App Offline): The driver is just a commuter. You must pursue their personal carrier. Strategic Note: Many personal policies in California now contain a “Rideshare Exclusion,” meaning if the driver was even thinking about turning on the app, their carrier might deny the claim.
  • Period 2 (App Open, No Match): Uber/Lyft provides “contingent” coverage. Per Insurance Code § 11580.1, this covers $50,000 for death/injury per person and $100,000 total.
  • Period 3 (Active Fare): This is the “Gold Standard.” The $1 million policy is active.

Example scenario: A driver in Bakersfield is distracted by a Lyft “ping” and hits a pedestrian. If the driver hadn’t clicked “Accept” yet, we are fighting for a $50k policy. If they had clicked it one second prior, we are in the $1 million bracket. We use timestamped metadata to prove that one second.

Proving Liability: Beyond the Police Report

Quick Answer: In 2026, proving liability in California requires Telematics Data Extraction. We move the court under CCP § 2031.010 to inspect the driver’s phone for “distracted behavior” (swiping, zooming) and the vehicle’s Event Data Recorder (EDR) to prove speed and braking patterns that often contradict driver testimony.

The “Distracted Driver” Presumption

Most rideshare accidents are caused by the interface itself. California Vehicle Code § 23123.5 prohibits holding a device, but rideshare drivers are effectively required to interact with screens to earn.

Our 2026 Discovery Checklist:

  1. Network Latency Logs: Did a delay in the 5G network cause the driver to look at their screen longer than usual?
  2. App-Switching History: Was the driver toggling between Uber and DoorDash? This is a violation of the “Terms of Service” that we leverage to show negligence.
  3. In-Cabin Audio/Video: If the driver used a dual-facing dashcam (common in San Diego and Los Angeles), we issue an immediate “Spoliation Letter” to prevent the deletion of that footage.

Legal Deserts: How We Serve Underserved California Counties

Quick Answer: Residents in “Legal Deserts” like Imperial County, Tulare, and the Far North (Modoc/Siskiyou) often settle for pennies because they lack local specialized counsel. Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp. uses “Virtual Litigation Units” to file claims, attend remote hearings, and manage medical liens via Zoom and eFiling, ensuring rural residents get San Diego-level results.

Filling the Gap in the Central Valley and Inland Empire

In regions like Fresno or San Bernardino, the ratio of rideshare passengers to specialized litigation attorneys is staggering.

RegionClaim DemandSpecialist DensityOur Remote Solution
Imperial CountyHigh (Border Crossings)Very LowVideo Consults & Remote Expert Testimony
Central ValleyHigh (Commuter Routes)ModerateeFiling in Fresno/Tulare Superior Courts
North CoastModerate (Tourism)Extremely LowDigital Evidence Collection via Local Partners

Strategic Advice for Rural Claimants: Do not assume you have to hire a local “general practice” lawyer who handles divorces and traffic tickets. We utilize the California Rules of Court, Rule 3.672 to appear remotely on your behalf, saving you thousands in travel costs while bringing high-stakes litigation experience to your local courthouse.

The 2026 Litigation Timeline: What to Expect

The path to a settlement or verdict in California is governed by strict procedural milestones.

MilestoneTimingLegal Basis
ImmediateDays 1–5Spoliation Letter sent to Uber/Lyft to preserve data.
Statute of Limitations2 YearsCCP § 335.1
Filing ComplaintMonth 3–6Filed in Superior Court (e.g., Stanley Mosk in LA).
Discovery PhaseMonths 6–18Subpoenaing Telematics and GPS records.
Mandatory SettlementMonths 18–22CRC Rule 3.1380 Conference.

2025-2026 Legal Updates: The “Common Carrier” Debate

Quick Answer: Recent 2025 appellate interpretations are shifting toward treating Uber and Lyft as Common Carriers under Civil Code § 2100. This requires them to use the “utmost care and diligence” for passenger safety, a much higher legal standard than “ordinary negligence,” making it easier to hold them liable for driver errors.

Why This Matters for Your Claim

At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we are aggressively arguing that rideshare platforms are not just “software companies” but modern transportation utilities.

  • The 2025 Shift: If a driver in Sacramento falls asleep, we no longer just prove they were tired; we argue the platform’s algorithm failed the “utmost care” standard by allowing a driver to stay online for 14 hours.
  • Pending 2026 Legislation: Watch for updates to AB 1228 which may expand platform liability for “gig economy” accidents involving delivery/rideshare hybrids.

Multi-Modal Resource: Key Evidence Video

Watch our 2-minute briefing on “How to Subpoena Uber GPS Data” to see how we prove your location and the driver’s speed at the exact moment of impact. [Link to Transcript/Video]

FAQ: California Rideshare Accidents

Who pays for my medical bills after an Uber accident in California?

Answer: Payout depends on the driver’s “Period.” If a ride was active (Period 3), Uber’s $1 million liability policy applies. If the driver was waiting for a ride (Period 2), lower limits apply. If the app was off, the driver’s personal insurance is primary.

What is the 2026 California rule for Uninsured Motorist coverage in rideshares?

Answer: Per SB 371 (effective Jan 1, 2026), mandatory Uninsured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage for rideshare passengers has been reduced from $1 million to $60,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. Liability coverage remains at $1 million.

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after a Lyft accident?

Answer: Under CCP § 335.1, you generally have two years from the date of the accident. However, if a government vehicle or dangerous road condition was involved, you must file a claim within 6 months per the Government Claims Act.

Can I sue Uber if my driver was distracted by the app?

Answer: Yes. We use digital forensics to subpoena telematics data proving the driver was interacting with the app or swiping between platforms at the time of impact, establishing a breach of the “utmost care” standard required of common carriers.

What happens if the Uber driver was “app-switching” during the crash?

Answer: This is “Period 0/1” complexity. If the driver was toggling between Uber and DoorDash, we utilize subpoenas to identify which platform’s “log-on” data confirms active agency, potentially unlocking higher commercial insurance tiers.

Are Uber drivers employees or independent contractors in 2026?

Answer: While Prop 22 currently classifies them as contractors with “portable benefits,” California courts and 2025 appellate rulings allow for “direct liability” claims against the platform for negligent hiring, vetting, or algorithmic supervision.

What if I was hit by an Uber driver while walking (pedestrian)?

Answer: Pedestrians are covered by the same “Period” rules. If the driver was transporting a passenger, you have access to the $1 million policy. If they were searching for a fare, coverage is limited to $50k/$100k/$30k under Insurance Code § 11580.1.

What is “Telematics Data” in a rideshare lawsuit?

Answer: Telematics includes GPS pings, acceleration logs, braking force, and swerve data recorded by the app. We use this evidence to contradict police reports or driver statements regarding speed and attention.

Does Uber’s insurance cover my lost wages?

Answer: Yes. If liability is established, the $1 million policy covers economic damages, including medical bills and lost earnings. We use your prior year’s tax returns and 1099s to calculate accurate future wage loss.

Can I use my own car insurance after a rideshare accident?

Answer: If you have “Uninsured Motorist” coverage on your personal policy, it may act as “excess” coverage, especially given the 2026 reduction in Uber’s mandatory UM/UIM limits. We coordinate all available policies to maximize your recovery.

What is the “Common Carrier” standard?

Answer: Under Civil Code § 2100, common carriers must use the “utmost care and diligence” for safe carriage. We argue rideshare companies meet this definition, holding them to a higher safety standard than regular drivers.

What should I do immediately after an Uber crash?

Answer: 1. Call 911. 2. Screenshot your ride receipt and the driver’s profile in-app. 3. Take photos of the scene. 4. Seek medical help. 5. Contact a lawyer before speaking to Uber’s insurance adjusters.

Does the Uber driver have to pay out of pocket?

Answer: Rarely. In most cases, the commercial insurance provided by Uber or Lyft pays the settlement. The driver is only personally liable if the damages exceed policy limits or if they were offline during the crash.

How do I prove the Uber app was “On” at the time of the crash?

Answer: We issue a “spoliation letter” to Uber/Lyft immediately to prevent the deletion of server logs. These logs provide timestamped data of when the driver was online, matched with a rider, or navigating.

Can I claim “Pain and Suffering” in a rideshare case?

Answer: Yes. Non-economic damages like emotional distress, pain, and suffering are recoverable under the $1 million liability policy, provided you were not the at-fault driver.

What is the “Rideshare Exclusion” in personal insurance?

Answer: Most personal auto policies exclude coverage for “driving for hire.” If you are a driver and hit someone while the app is on, your personal insurance will likely deny the claim, leaving you reliant on the platform’s contingent policy.

What happens if my Uber driver was intoxicated?

Answer: This opens the door for “Punitive Damages” under Civil Code § 3294. We pursue these additional awards to punish reckless behavior and hold the platform accountable for inadequate driver monitoring.

Do I have to go to court for a rideshare claim?

Answer: Most cases settle through negotiation or mediation. However, if the insurance company refuses a fair offer, we are prepared to take your case to trial in any of California’s 58 superior courts.

How much does a rideshare accident lawyer cost?

Answer: At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we work on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay $0 upfront and we only collect a fee if we win your case or secure a settlement.

Can I file a claim if the accident happened in a rural county?

Answer: Yes. We represent clients statewide, including “legal deserts” like Imperial, Modoc, and the Central Valley. We use eFiling and remote video appearances to manage your case without you ever needing to travel to a major city.

Contact Our Office

Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp. 4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c, San Diego, CA 92109 (619) 436-7544

Available Statewide: We provide free, high-stakes case evaluations via encrypted video conferencing for clients in all 58 California counties. Whether you are in the heart of San Diego or a remote corner of the Central Valley, our “Virtual First” litigation model ensures you have elite representation without the need for travel.

[Schedule Your Free 2026 Case Audit Today]

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

More Resources:

Legal-Champ – Litigation Guides

Buy A Trust – Automated Trust Tools

Demand Letter on Demand – Legal Notices

Teddy Accounting – Tax & Business Strategy

English Subpages

1: The 2026 SB 371 Insurance Gap Analysis

  • Top 3 Keywords: SB 371 rideshare insurance, Uber UM UIM limits 2026, California rideshare coverage gap.
  • Description: An expert breakdown of the 2026 legislative shift that reduced mandatory uninsured motorist coverage for rideshare passengers. This page explains how to find “excess” coverage when a $60,000 policy is insufficient for catastrophic injuries.

2: Digital Forensics and Telematics in Rideshare Discovery

  • Top 3 Keywords: Rideshare telematics evidence, subpoena Uber GPS logs, proving distracted driving.
  • Description: A technical guide on using CCP § 2031.010 to compel the production of “Driver Event Data.” It details how acceleration, braking, and app-swiping logs can be used to override a faulty police report.

3: Period 0 and App-Switching Liability

  • Top 3 Keywords: Uber app switching accident, Period 0 rideshare liability, multi-app driver negligence.
  • Description: A strategic guide for accidents occurring while a driver is toggling between Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash. It explains how to establish agency when a driver is “deadheading” but not yet matched with a passenger.

4: Common Carrier Standards for Rideshare Platforms

  • Top 3 Keywords: Civil Code 2100 rideshare, utmost care standard Uber, California common carrier liability.
  • Description: Analysis of 2025-2026 appellate rulings that treat rideshare companies as common carriers. This page explains why Uber/Lyft are held to a “higher duty of care” than ordinary drivers in California.

5: Rideshare Pedestrian and Micro-Mobility Injuries

  • Top 3 Keywords: Uber pedestrian accident California, hit by Lyft driver while walking, rideshare scooter collision.
  • Description: Focused on non-passengers injured by rideshare vehicles. It navigates the complexity of Period 2 coverage ($50k/$100k) versus Period 3 ($1M) for pedestrians in urban hubs like San Diego and LA.

6: Rural Access: Rideshare Litigation in California’s Legal Deserts

  • Top 3 Keywords: Imperial County Uber lawyer, Central Valley rideshare accident attorney, remote legal services California.
  • Description: Specifically targeting underserved counties (Modoc, Tulare, Imperial). It explains how our firm uses virtual litigation tools to bridge the gap for rural victims who lack access to specialized rideshare counsel.

7: Assault and Third-Party Liability on Rideshare Platforms

  • Top 3 Keywords: Uber driver assault lawsuit, negligent hiring rideshare California, passenger safety litigation.
  • Description: Legal pathways for victims of driver misconduct. It explores “Negligent Entrustment” claims and how California’s 2026 vetting standards affect platform liability for intentional torts.

8: Calculating Gig Economy Wage Loss and Damages

  • Top 3 Keywords: Rideshare accident lost wages, CCP 3287 prejudgment interest, gig worker disability claim.
  • Description: A specialized manual on quantifying economic damages for victims who are themselves gig workers. It details how to use 1099 history to project future earnings loss in a volatile market.

9: Public Entity Liability in Rideshare Collisions

  • Top 3 Keywords: Uber accident involving city bus, Gov Code 911.2 claim, dangerous road condition rideshare.
  • Description: Navigating the 6-month statute of limitations when a rideshare accident involves government property or vehicles, highlighting the critical overlap between the Government Claims Act and Insurance Code § 11580.1.

10: Post-Accident Medical Liens and 2026 Coding Standards

  • Top 3 Keywords: California medical lien negotiation, rideshare accident surgery costs, factoring company litigation.
  • Description: How to manage medical treatment on a lien basis after a rideshare crash. This page covers the 2026 shifts in “reasonable value” evidence under the Corenbaum and Howell precedents.

Chinese (简体中文) Subpages

1: 2026年加州优步与Lyft乘客权利指南 (California Uber/Lyft Passenger Rights 2026)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 优步事故律师 (Uber accident lawyer), 加州乘车赔偿 (California rideshare compensation), 100万美元保额 (1 million insurance policy).
  • Description: 为加州华人社区提供的综合指南，详细说明在发生事故后如何激活100万美元的保额，以及在司机未开启应用时如何处理。

2: SB 371 法案解析：您的保险额度是否缩水？ (SB 371 Analysis: Is Your Coverage Shrinking?)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 加州保险法更新 (CA insurance law update), 无保险驾驶员理赔 (Uninsured motorist claim), 乘车安全 (Rideshare safety).
  • Description: 深度解读2026年1月生效的新法规。解释为何乘客的无保险/保额不足（UM/UIM）赔偿限额被大幅下调，以及华人乘客应如何应对。

3: 远程法律援助：服务全加州华人 (Remote Legal Aid: Serving All CA Chinese Residents)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 华人律师远程服务 (Chinese lawyer remote service), 弗雷斯诺优步律师 (Fresno Uber lawyer), 视频咨询 (Video consultation).
  • Description: 针对中央山谷（Central Valley）和内陆帝国（Inland Empire）等法律资源匮乏地区的华人，介绍我们如何通过电子申报和远程视频提供法律支持。

4: 优步司机分心驾驶与电子数据取证 (Distracted Driving & Electronic Discovery)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 手机取证 (Phone forensics), 优步后台数据 (Uber backend data), 事故责任认定 (Accident liability).
  • Description: 解释我们如何通过法律程序获取司机的后台日志，证明事故发生时司机正在操作多个应用，从而确立其过失责任。

5: 乘车事故后的医疗费用支付与追讨 (Medical Expense Payment & Recovery)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 医疗留置权 (Medical liens), 误工费索赔 (Lost wage claim), 人身伤害赔偿 (Personal injury compensation).
  • Description: 指导华人在没有健康保险或保险额度不足的情况下，如何通过“留置权”方式获得及时治疗，并在结案时从保险公司获得全额赔付。

6: 优步/Lyft 撞人事故（行人权利） (Rideshare Pedestrian Accidents)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 优步撞人理赔 (Uber pedestrian claim), 行人交通事故 (Pedestrian traffic accident), 商业保险追偿 (Commercial insurance recovery).
  • Description: 专门针对被优步车辆撞伤的行人。分析在不同“时段”（Periods）下，行人可以申请到的最高保额差异。

7: 算法监督与平台责任：2026新动态 (Algorithmic Supervision & Platform Liability)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 平台责任 (Platform liability), 独立合同工争议 (Independent contractor dispute), 加州民事法典 (CA Civil Code).
  • Description: 探讨2025-2026年最新的法院判例，说明优步不仅仅是一个软件平台，在管理不当时也需承担“承运人”责任。

8: 华人小企业主与优步商务旅行事故 (Chinese Business Owners & Uber Business Travel)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 商务乘车保险 (Business rideshare insurance), 雇主责任 (Employer liability), 职业伤害 (Occupational injury).
  • Description: 针对在商务差旅期间发生优步事故的华人雇主和员工，分析劳工赔偿（Workers’ Comp）与商业车险的重叠。

Subpage 9: 致命事故与家属追偿权 (Fatal Accidents & Wrongful Death)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 意外死亡索赔 (Wrongful death claim), 遗产继承律师 (Inheritance lawyer), 加州生存诉讼 (CA survival action).
  • Description: 为失去亲人的家庭提供法律支持。解释如何在加州法律框架下，追究优步公司在司机招聘和监管方面的过失。

10: 事故后的“间接损失”计算 (Calculating Consequential Losses Post-Accident)

  • Top 3 Keywords: 疼痛与痛苦赔偿 (Pain and suffering), 财产损失评估 (Property damage appraisal), 法律费用估算 (Legal fee estimation).
  • Description: 详细说明如何证明非经济损失，如精神创伤和生活质量下降，确保华人在跨国或跨州案件中获得公正待遇。

Hebrew (עברית) Subpages

1: זכויות נוסעי Uber ו-Lyft בקליפורניה: מדריך 2026 (Passenger Rights 2026)

  • Top 3 Keywords: עורך דין תאונות Uber (Uber accident lawyer), פיצויים בקליפורניה (CA compensation), פוליסת מיליון דולר (1 million dollar policy).
  • Description: מדריך מקיף לקהילה הישראלית בקליפורניה המסביר את חלוקת הביטוח לפי “תקופות” (Periods) וכיצד להבטיח את הפיצוי המקסימלי לאחר תאונה.

2: השפעת חוק SB 371 על הכיסוי הביטוחי שלך (Impact of SB 371 on Your Coverage)

  • Top 3 Keywords: עדכוני ביטוח 2026 (2026 insurance updates), נהג ללא ביטוח (Uninsured motorist), חוקי התעבורה בקליפורניה (CA traffic laws).
  • Description: ניתוח של צמצום הכיסוי הביטוחי לנפגעים מנהגים ללא ביטוח (UM/UIM) שנכנס לתוקף ב-2026. מה המשמעות עבור נוסעים ישראלים ואיך להשלים את הפער.

3: ליטיגציה מרחוק: שירות משפטי בכל קליפורניה (Remote Litigation: Statewide Legal Services)

  • Top 3 Keywords: ייצוג משפטי מרחוק (Remote legal representation), עורך דין ישראלי בקליפורניה (Israeli lawyer in CA), פגישת ייעוץ בווידאו (Video consultation).
  • Description: פתרונות משפטיים לישראלים המתגוררים באזורים מרוחקים כמו העמק המרכזי או אימפריאל קאונטי. אנו מגישים תביעות ומנהלים דיונים בזום בכל 58 המחוזות.

4: הוכחת רשלנות באמצעות נתוני טלמטיקה (Proving Negligence via Telematics)

  • Top 3 Keywords: ראיות דיגיטליות (Digital evidence), יומני נסיעה Uber (Uber trip logs), הסחת דעת בנהיגה (Distracted driving).
  • Description: כיצד אנו משתמשים בצווי בית משפט כדי להוציא נתונים מהאפליקציה שמוכיחים שהנהג התעסק בטלפון ברגע התאונה, גם אם הוא מכחיש זאת.

5: תאונות הולכי רגל ורכבי Uber (Uber Pedestrian Accidents)

  • Top 3 Keywords: פגיעה בהולך רגל (Pedestrian injury), תביעת נזיקין (Torts claim), ביטוח מסחרי קליפורניה (CA commercial insurance).
  • Description: מדריך להולכי רגל שנפגעו מרכב של Uber או Lyft. הבנת ההבדל בין פוליסת צד ג’ בסיסית לפוליסה המסחרית המורחבת.

6: סטנדרט “המוביל הציבורי” וחבות פלטפורמות (Common Carrier Standard)

  • Top 3 Keywords: חובת זהירות עליונה (Utmost care duty), אחריות תאגידית (Corporate liability), פסיקה חדשה 2025 (New 2025 case law).
  • Description: הסבר על השינוי המשפטי המטיל אחריות מוגברת על חברות הנסיעות השיתופיות, בדומה לאוטובוסים ורכבות, מה שמקל על הוכחת אשמה.

7: ניהול חובות רפואיים ולינאריים לאחר תאונה (Managing Medical Liens)

  • Top 3 Keywords: טיפול רפואי במימון תביעה (Medical lien treatment), הוצאות רפואיות (Medical expenses), הסדרי חוב (Debt settlements).
  • Description: כיצד לקבל טיפול רפואי איכותי ללא תשלום מיידי דרך “Medical Liens” וכיצד אנו מפחיתים את החובות הללו בסוף התיק כדי להשאיר יותר כסף בכיס הלקוח.

8: תביעות מוות ברשלנות בנסיעות שיתופיות (Wrongful Death Claims)

  • Top 3 Keywords: מוות ברשלנות קליפורניה (Wrongful death CA), פיצוי ליורשים (Compensation for heirs), חוק הירושה קליפורניה (CA probate code).
  • Description: תמיכה משפטית למשפחות שאיבדו קרוב בתאונת Uber. כיצד לתבוע פיצויים על אובדן תמיכה כלכלית וסבל נפשי.

9: תקיפה והטרדה בנסיעות שיתופיות (Assault and Harassment in Rideshares)

  • Top 3 Keywords: ביטחון נוסעים (Passenger safety), תביעה נגד Uber (Lawsuit against Uber), רשלנות בסינון נהגים (Negligent vetting).
  • Description: מדריך משפטי לנפגעי עבירה מצד נהגים. אנו בוחנים את תהליכי סינון הנהגים של החברה ותובעים על כשלים במערכות האבטחה.

10: חישוב הפסדי השתכרות לבעלי עסקים ועצמאיים (Calculating Loss of Income for Self-Employed)

  • Top 3 Keywords: אובדן כושר עבודה (Loss of earning capacity), עצמאיים בקליפורניה (Self-employed in CA), חוות דעת אקטוארית (Actuarial opinion).
  • Description: עבור ישראלים בעלי עסקים שנפצעו: כיצד להוכיח הפסדי הכנסה מורכבים ודיבידנדים שנפגעו בעקבות התאונה באמצעות דוחות מס וניתוח פיננסי.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

{ “@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “LegalService”, “name”: “Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp.”, “description”: “Statewide California Rideshare Accident & Personal Injury Litigation”, “url”: “https://lbatlaw.com”, “telephone”: “+1-619-436-7544”, “address”: { “@type”: “PostalAddress”, “streetAddress”: “4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c”, “addressLocality”: “San Diego”, “addressRegion”: “CA”, “postalCode”: “92109”, “addressCountry”: “US” }, “knowsAbout”: [“Rideshare Accidents”, “Uber/Lyft Litigation”, “Insurance Code § 11580.2”, “Public Utilities Code § 5433”], “areaServed”: { “@type”: “State”, “name”: “California” }, “priceRange”: “$$” }