California Constructive Trust Lawyer – San Diego Equitable Remedy

California constructive trust lawyer in San Diego helps recover misappropriated property through equitable remedies. Under Civil Code § 2223, impose a constructive trust on fraudulently obtained assets.

San Diego Constructive Trust Essentials

• What Is a Constructive Trust? A constructive trust is an equitable remedy – not a separate cause of action – that compels a wrongdoer to transfer property to its rightful owner. It is imposed when a person holds property obtained by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, or other wrongful act. Civil Code § 2223
• Three Elements to Impose: (1) a specific res (identifiable property), (2) the plaintiff’s right to that res, and (3) the defendant’s wrongful acquisition or detention of the res.
• Fraud Triggers the Remedy: A constructive trust may be imposed where property is taken by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, violation of a trust, or other wrongful act. No actual fraudulent intent is required – constructive fraud suffices. Civil Code § 2224
• Three‑Year Discovery Rule: Under Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d), when a constructive trust claim is based on fraud, the three-year statute of limitations runs from the date the beneficiary discovers the fraud – not from the date of the wrongful act.
• Shoker/Newell Framework for Lis Pendens: A constructive trust claim qualifies as a “real property claim” under CCP § 405.4 only if it seeks to recover title to specific, identifiable real property – not merely use the property as security for a money debt. This allows recording of a lis pendens to freeze the property.
• San Diego Filing – Probate Department: Constructive trust claims arising from a trust or estate dispute must be filed in the Probate Department at the Central Courthouse, 1100 Union St., assigned to departments 1501-1504 based on the last two digits of the case number. Filing in general civil division risks transfer and delay. Local Rule 2.1.5 requires a meet‑and‑confer declaration.

---

California Constructive Trust Lawyer: Recovering Stolen Property Through Equity

Your sibling forged your mother’s signature on a deed transferring the family home to themselves. Your trustee “borrowed” trust funds to buy a vacation home – in their own name. A caregiver tricked your elderly father into signing a trust amendment leaving everything to her.

You cannot just ask for the property back. You need a constructive trust.

California law gives courts the power to impose a constructive trust – an equitable remedy that treats a wrongdoer as a “trustee” holding stolen property for the rightful owner’s benefit. The property does not belong to the wrongdoer. It belongs to you. The court simply declares that truth.

This guide explains exactly how constructive trusts work in California, the elements you must prove, the statute of limitations, the Shoker/Newell framework for lis pendens, and the correct San Diego filing procedures for trust‑based claims.

Quick Answer – What Is a Constructive Trust in California? A constructive trust is an equitable remedy imposed by a court to prevent unjust enrichment. It compels a person who holds property obtained by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, the violation of a trust, or other wrongful act to transfer that property to its rightful owner. Unlike an express trust, a constructive trust is not created by agreement – it is imposed by law.

Internal Link – Trustee Misappropriation: If the constructive trust arises from a trustee’s theft or self‑dealing, see California Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawyer.

Internal Link – Trust Litigation: For comprehensive trust contest strategies, see California Trust Litigation Lawyer.

---

Constructive Trust vs. Resulting Trust: What Is the Difference?

Quick Answer – How Does a Constructive Trust Differ from a Resulting Trust? A constructive trust is imposed by a court as a remedy for wrongful conduct – fraud, undue influence, or breach of fiduciary duty. A resulting trust arises from the presumed intent of the parties when property is transferred without consideration. Constructive trusts remedy wrongdoing; resulting trusts implement implied intent.

Type	Origin	Purpose	Example
Constructive Trust	Imposed by court as a remedy	Prevent unjust enrichment, remedy fraud	Forged deed transferring family home
Resulting Trust	Arises from presumed intent	Implement parties’ implied intent	Property purchased in another’s name with your funds

Constructive Trust: The court creates the trust to undo a wrongful act. The wrongdoer never had rightful ownership. The court simply declares what should have been true all along – the property belongs to the victim.

Resulting Trust: The court infers that the parties intended a trust based on their conduct. No wrongdoing is required – only a transfer without consideration and a reasonable expectation of a trust relationship.

Internal Link – Forged Deeds: For constructive trust claims involving forged deeds and title theft, see Equity Theft & Elder Title Fraud Lawyer.

---

The Three Elements of a Constructive Trust Claim

Quick Answer – What Must You Prove to Impose a Constructive Trust? A party seeking imposition of a constructive trust must establish three elements: (1) the existence of a res – specific property or an interest in property; (2) the plaintiff’s right to that res; and (3) the wrongful acquisition or detention of the res by another party who is not justly entitled to it.

Element 1: A Specific Res (Identifiable Property)

You must identify specific property – not just a general claim for money damages. The property can be:

• Real property (house, land, commercial building)
• Personal property (vehicles, artwork, collectibles)
• Intangible property (bank accounts, stock certificates)
• Traceable proceeds of misappropriated property

Why This Matters for Lis Pendens: Under the Shoker/Newell framework, a constructive trust claim qualifies as a “real property claim” under CCP § 405.4 only if it seeks to recover title to a specific, identifiable piece of real property – not merely use the property as security for a money debt.

Element 2: Plaintiff’s Right to the Res

You must demonstrate a superior right to the specific property. This can be established through:

• Ownership documentation (deed, title, trust instrument)
• Evidence of a prior interest in the property
• Proof that the property was acquired with your assets (tracing)

Element 3: Wrongful Acquisition or Detention

The defendant must have acquired or retained the property through wrongful conduct. California law recognizes a broad range of wrongful acts:

• Fraud: Intentional misrepresentation
• Undue influence: Exploitation of a confidential relationship
• Breach of fiduciary duty: Misappropriation by a trustee or agent
• Forgery: Falsified signature on a deed or trust amendment
• Accident or mistake: Clerical error or misunderstanding

No Intent Required: Constructive fraud – a breach of duty that gains an advantage without actual fraudulent intent – is sufficient.

Internal Link – Vulnerable Seniors: If the wrongful acquisition involved exploitation of an elderly or dependent adult, see California Lack of Capacity Lawyer San Diego.

Internal Link – Predatory Signatures: If the constructive trust arises from a forged or fraudulently induced signature, see California Fraud in Execution Lawyer.

---

Statutory Basis: California Civil Code § 2223 and § 2224

Quick Answer – What California Statutes Authorize Constructive Trusts? Civil Code § 2223 provides that a constructive trust is created when a person obtains property by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, violation of a trust, or other wrongful act. Civil Code § 2224 requires that such a person hold the property as an involuntary trustee for the injured party.

Civil Code § 2223: “One who gains a thing by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, the violation of a trust or other wrongful act, is, unless he or she has some other and better right thereto, an involuntary trustee of the thing gained for the benefit of the person who would otherwise have had it.”

Civil Code § 2224: “One who gains a thing by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, the violation of a trust or other wrongful act, is, unless he or she has some other and better right thereto, an involuntary trustee of the thing gained for the benefit of the person who would otherwise have had it.”

What This Means in Practice: These statutes do not create a separate “cause of action” for constructive trust. Instead, they provide the substantive legal basis for the remedy. You must plead an underlying wrong (fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, etc.) and request a constructive trust as the remedy.

External Authority Link: California Civil Code § 2223

External Authority Link: California Civil Code § 2224

Internal Link – Business/LLC Fraud: If the misappropriated assets are held in a corporate entity or LLC, see California Corporate Compliance Lawyer.

---

The Constructive Trust Remedy Is Not a Separate Cause of Action

Quick Answer – Can You File a Lawsuit for “Constructive Trust” Alone? No. A constructive trust is a remedy – not an independent cause of action. You must plead an underlying substantive claim such as fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or unjust enrichment. The constructive trust is the remedy you seek after proving the underlying wrong.

How to Properly Plead a Constructive Trust Claim:

1. Plead the underlying cause of action: Fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, unjust enrichment, etc.
2. Allege the specific res: Identify the property subject to the constructive trust with particularity.
3. Request the remedy: Ask the court to declare the defendant a constructive trustee and order conveyance of the property.

Example: A trustee misappropriates $500,000 from a trust and uses the funds to purchase real property in their own name. You plead breach of fiduciary duty, identify the specific property, and request a constructive trust.

Strategic Note: At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we always plead constructive trust as a requested remedy alongside substantive claims. We never file a standalone “cause of action” for constructive trust – that would be demurred immediately.

---

Constructive Trusts in Caregiver Fraud Cases: The Newell Case (2025)

Quick Answer – How Are Constructive Trusts Used in Caregiver Fraud Cases? In Newell v. Superior Court (2025), a caregiver used misappropriated trust funds to purchase real property in her own name. The court permitted the daughter to seek a constructive trust on that property – allowing her to trace diverted trust assets into a specific piece of real estate and recover it for the trust.

The Facts: Arthur, an elderly man, amended his trust to name his caregiver, Neneth Rollins, as both trustee and sole beneficiary. After Arthur’s death, his daughter Lucy challenged the amendments, alleging fraud and undue influence. Rollins then used trust assets to purchase real property in Van Nuys in her own name. Lucy sought to impose a constructive trust on that property and recorded a lis pendens.

The Holding: The appellate court held that Lucy’s petition – seeking to impose a constructive trust on specific real property – constituted a “real property claim” under CCP § 405.4, allowing her to maintain the lis pendens during litigation.

What This Means for San Diego Clients: If a fiduciary misappropriates trust assets and uses them to purchase real property, you can impose a constructive trust on that property – even if the fiduciary holds title in their own name.

---

Constructive Trusts and Lis Pendens: The Shoker/Newell Framework

Quick Answer – Can You Record a Lis Pendens with a Constructive Trust Claim? Yes – but only if the constructive trust claim seeks to recover title to a specific, identifiable piece of real property, not merely use the property as security for a money debt. The Shoker (2022) and Newell (2025) rulings established this framework under CCP § 405.4.

The Shoker Framework: In Shoker v. Superior Court (2022), the Court of Appeal held that a constructive trust claim seeking to impose a trust on specific real property is a “real property claim” under CCP § 405.4, allowing recordation of a lis pendens. The court emphasized that the claim must affect title to or possession of specific real property.

The Newell Clarification (2025): Newell reaffirmed and refined the framework: a constructive trust claim qualifies for a lis pendens only if the plaintiff seeks to recover the property itself – not just to use the property as a source of payment for a money judgment. The claim must be “real property specific.”

What This Means for San Diego Clients: Before recording a lis pendens, we ensure that the constructive trust claim explicitly seeks conveyance of the specific property, not merely a monetary surcharge secured by the property.

Strategic Note: At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we record a lis pendens immediately upon filing any constructive trust claim affecting San Diego real property – but only after verifying that the claim meets the Shoker/Newell specificity requirement.

External Authority Link: Code of Civil Procedure § 405.4 – Definition of “real property claim.”

---

The Three‑Year Statute of Limitations Under CCP § 338(d)

Quick Answer – How Long Do You Have to Seek a Constructive Trust? When the constructive trust claim is based on fraud, Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d) imposes a three-year statute of limitations. Crucially, the clock runs from the date the aggrieved party discovers the fraud – not from the date of the wrongful act. If the fraud was concealed, the limitations period may be extended.

The Statutory Language: Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d) provides a three-year limitation for “[a]n action for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake. The cause of action in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery, by the aggrieved party, of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake.”

What This Means for San Diego Beneficiaries: If a fiduciary concealed their wrongful acts – by providing false accountings, hiding documents, or actively lying – the three-year clock does not begin until you actually discover the fraud. At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we investigate the timing of discovery and, when appropriate, argue for delayed accrual under the discovery rule.

The “Gravamen” Test

California courts apply the “gravamen” test: if the gist of an action is fraud, the three-year statute of limitations in § 338(d) applies – regardless of the form of the pleading. This is true even if the complaint also alleges breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, or other claims.

Numerical Example: A trustee steals $200,000 from a trust in 2020 but provides false accountings showing the funds were “invested and lost.” In 2025, a forensic accountant discovers the truth. The three-year clock under § 338(d) begins in 2025 – not 2020. The claim is timely.

External Authority Link: Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d)

---

Constructive Trust vs. Other Equitable Remedies

Quick Answer – How Does a Constructive Trust Differ from Surcharge or Accounting? A constructive trust recovers specific property. Surcharge forces a fiduciary to personally repay losses. An accounting forces disclosure of trust transactions. Constructive trust is the remedy of choice when the wrongdoer still possesses the specific property or its traceable proceeds.

Remedy	What It Does	When to Use
Constructive Trust	Compels transfer of specific property	Wrongdoer still has the property or its traceable proceeds
Surcharge	Personal liability for losses	Wrongdoer has dissipated the property and cannot return it
Accounting	Compels disclosure of transactions	You need to discover what property is missing
Double Damages (§ 859)	Penalty for bad faith	Wrongdoer acted with fraud or oppression

Strategic Note: At Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp., we often request multiple remedies in the same petition: an accounting to discover what was taken, a constructive trust to recover specific property still in the wrongdoer’s possession, and a surcharge for any dissipated assets.

---

San Diego Superior Court: Where to File Your Constructive Trust Claim (2026)

Quick Answer – Where Do You File a Constructive Trust Lawsuit in San Diego? Constructive trust claims that arise out of a trust or estate dispute must be filed in the Probate Department at the Central Courthouse, 1100 Union St.. The case is assigned to departments 1501, 1502, 1503, or 1504 based on the last two digits of the case number. Filing in the general civil division risks transfer and significant delays.

Key San Diego Filing Information

Item	Detail
Courthouse	Central Courthouse, 1100 Union St., San Diego, CA 92101
Proper venue for trust‑based claims	Probate Department (departments 1501-1504 based on case number)
Civil department for non‑trust claims	Unlimited civil – assignment based on case number
Filing method	Mandatory eFiling through Odyssey (attorneys in civil and probate actions must eFile)
Local Rule 2.1.5	Meet‑and‑confer declaration required before any contested hearing
Local Rule 4.4.5	Remote appearances permitted with notice
Small claims limit	$10,000 for individuals – constructive trust claims almost always exceed this

The Meet‑and‑Confer Requirement – Local Rule 2.1.5

Before filing a contested petition or motion seeking a constructive trust, you must meet and confer with the opposing party (or their attorney) in person or by phone. You must file a declaration stating:

• The date and time of the meeting
• Who participated
• The issues discussed
• Whether any agreement was reached

Failure to file this declaration = your petition may be denied or continued. Out‑of‑area attorneys often miss this rule.

Mandatory eFiling in Civil and Probate Actions

Attorneys representing parties in limited and unlimited civil actions, as well as probate actions, must submit filings electronically through the court’s approved Electronic Filing Service Providers (EFSPs).

Post‑Judgment Enforcement by San Diego County Sheriff

If you obtain a judgment imposing a constructive trust on real property, the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department enforces levies and property transfers.

External Authority Link: San Diego Superior Court Central Courthouse

External Authority Link: San Diego Superior Court Local Rules (Civil)

---

FAQ – Constructive Trusts in California

{ “@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “LegalService”, “name”: “Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp.”, “description”: “San Diego constructive trust lawyer helping beneficiaries recover misappropriated property through equitable remedies under Civil Code § 2223.”, “url”: “https://lbatlaw.com/california-constructive-trust-lawyer-san-diego/”, “logo”: “https://lbatlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/logo.png”, “image”: “https://i0.wp.com/lbatlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-19-2026-02_17_58-PM-e1773955211844.png”, “priceRange”: “$$”, “telephone”: “(619) 436-7544”, “address”: { “@type”: “PostalAddress”, “streetAddress”: “4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c”, “addressLocality”: “San Diego”, “addressRegion”: “CA”, “postalCode”: “92109”, “addressCountry”: “US” }, “openingHoursSpecification”: [ { “@type”: “OpeningHoursSpecification”, “dayOfWeek”: [“Monday”, “Tuesday”, “Wednesday”, “Thursday”, “Friday”, “Saturday”, “Sunday”], “opens”: “00:00”, “closes”: “23:59” } ], “knowsAbout”: [ “Constructive Trust”, “Civil Code § 2223”, “Shoker/Newell Framework”, “Lis Pendens”, “Asset Tracing”, “Hamlin v. Estate of Hamlin” ], “sameAs”: [ “https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61586836011088”, “https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/92109-ca-leeran-barzilai-“, “https://www.martindale.com/attorney/leeran-s-barzilai” ] }

Contact Our Office

Leeran S. Barzilai, A Prof. Law Corp.

Address: 4501 Mission Bay Dr. #3c, San Diego, CA 92109

Phone: (619) 436-7544

If a fiduciary has misappropriated your property through fraud, undue influence, breach of duty, or other wrongful conduct, contact our office today for a free consultation.

We serve all San Diego County communities, including downtown San Diego, Mission Bay, La Jolla, Del Mar, Encinitas, Carlsbad, Escondido, and Chula Vista. Constructive trust claims arising from trust or estate disputes are filed in the Probate Department at the Central Courthouse (departments 1501-1504). We have extensive experience with San Diego’s mandatory eFiling requirements, Local Rule 2.1.5 meet‑and‑confer declarations, the Shoker/Newell framework for lis pendens, and post‑judgment enforcement by the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department.

Call (619) 436-7544 or complete our online contact form to schedule your consultation.

---

Internal links embedded (six total, as requested):

1. California Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawyer
2. Equity Theft & Elder Title Fraud Lawyer
3. California Lack of Capacity Lawyer San Diego
4. California Fraud in Execution Lawyer
5. California Corporate Compliance Lawyer
6. California Trust Litigation Lawyer

External .gov links embedded (six total):

• California Civil Code § 2223
• California Civil Code § 2224
• Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d)
• Code of Civil Procedure § 405.4
• San Diego Superior Court Central Courthouse
• San Diego Superior Court Local Rules (Civil)

• California Real Estate Litigation Attorney
• California Wrongful Termination Lawyer: Your Guide to Workplace Rights
• [San Diego Wrongful Death Lawyer] + [Drunk Driving Punitive Damages] + [in Mission Valley]
• When a Partner Owes You Millions: Business Divorce & Fiduciary Duty Litigation in California
• California Design Professional Lawyer: Enforcing Liens Under § 8300 in San Diego

English Subpages

1. Constructive Trust for Real Estate & Title Theft
   • Focus: Recovering homes stolen via forged deeds or elder financial fraud.
   • Keywords: California Constructive Trust Remedy, Real Estate Fraud Litigation San Diego, Surcharge and Asset Tracing.
2. Constructive Trust vs. Resulting Trust
   • Focus: Explaining the difference between court-imposed remedies and intent-based trusts.
   • Keywords: Constructive vs Resulting Trust California, Equitable Remedies in Probate, California Trust Litigation Lawyer.
3. Clawing Back Stolen Life Insurance Proceeds
   • Focus: Using equity to recover death benefits paid to a fraudulent beneficiary.
   • Keywords: Life Insurance Beneficiary Fraud, Constructive Trust on Insurance Proceeds, California Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawyer.
4. Constructive Trusts in Marvin Actions (Unmarried Partners)
   • Focus: Securing property rights for domestic partners after a breakup or death.
   • Keywords: Marvin Action Constructive Trust, Unmarried Partner Property Rights, San Diego Palimony Lawyer.
5. Proving Unjust Enrichment in San Diego
   • Focus: The legal requirements to show someone gained property they aren’t entitled to.
   • Keywords: Unjust Enrichment Elements California, California Probate Code § 16420, Restitution for Financial Elder Abuse.
6. Forensic Asset Tracing: Following the Money
   • Focus: Using accounting to find where stolen assets were hidden or reinvested.
   • Keywords: Forensic Asset Tracing San Diego, Commingled Funds Recovery, California Corporate Compliance Lawyer.
7. Lis Pendens: Freezing Property During Litigation
   • Focus: Recording a legal notice to prevent the sale of a home during a trust dispute.
   • Keywords: Lis Pendens Constructive Trust Claim, San Diego Superior Court Central Courthouse, Notice of Pending Action California.
8. The “Hamlin” Pivot: Standing for Intestate Heirs
   • Focus: Helping heirs left out of fraudulent trust amendments gain the right to sue.
   • Keywords: Hamlin v Estate of Hamlin Standing, Equity Theft & Elder Title Fraud Lawyer, Intestate Heir Constructive Trust.
9. Breach of Confidential Relationship Claims
   • Focus: Betrayal of trust by family members, caregivers, or close advisors.
   • Keywords: California Lack of Capacity Lawyer San Diego, Breach of Confidential Relationship, Undue Influence Constructive Trust.
10. Voiding Fraudulent Transfers: Execution vs. Inducement
    • Focus: Distinguishing between being tricked into signing vs. forged signatures.
    • Keywords: California Fraud in Execution Lawyer, Void Ab Initio Property Transfer, San Diego Forgery Litigation.

---

Chinese Subpages (中文)

1. 房产盗窃与推定信托救济 (Real Estate Theft)
   • 关键词: 加州推定信托救济, 圣地亚哥房地产欺诈诉讼, 追缴被盗房产.
2. 推定信托与归属信托的区别 (Constructive vs. Resulting Trust)
   • 关键词: 推定信托法律定义, 加州信托诉讼律师, 遗嘱验证衡平法救济.
3. 追讨被盗的人寿保险金 (Life Insurance Fraud)
   • 关键词: 保险受益人欺诈诉讼, 加州违反受托责任律师, 追回保险赔偿金.
4. 未婚合伙人的财产权利 (Marvin Actions)
   • 关键词: 马文诉讼推定信托, 圣地亚哥同居财产争议, 未婚伴侣遗产继承权.
5. 证明不当得利与财产返还 (Unjust Enrichment)
   • 关键词: 不当得利法律要素, 加州遗产法典第16420条, 老人财务虐待赔偿.
6. 法证资产追踪：追踪被盗资金 (Asset Tracing)
   • 关键词: 圣地亚哥资产追踪调查, 加州公司合规律师, 混合资金追讨.
7. 诉讼待决公告：冻结房产交易 (Lis Pendens)
   • 关键词: 房产诉讼保全通知, 圣地亚哥中央法院诉讼, 防止房产非法出售.
8. 法定继承人的起诉权 (Hamlin Ruling)
   • 关键词: Hamlin 判例起诉权, 房产窃取与老人确权律师, 挑战欺诈性信托修订.
9. 违反信任关系起诉 (Confidential Relationships)
   • 关键词: 圣地亚哥认知障碍法律专家, 违反信任义务, 不当影响撤销财产转让.
10. 撤销欺诈性财产转让 (Fraudulent Transfers)
    • 关键词: 加州签名欺诈律师, 房产转让无效诉讼, 圣地亚哥伪造文书起诉.

---

Hebrew Subpages (עברית)

1. נאמנות קונסטרוקטיבית לגניבת מקרקעין (Real Estate Theft)
   • מילות מפתח: סעד נאמנות קונסטרוקטיבית קליפורניה, ליטיגציה של הונאת נדל”ן סן דייגו, השבת רכוש שנגנב.
2. נאמנות קונסטרוקטיבית מול נאמנות משתמעת (Constructive vs. Resulting)
   • מילות מפתח: הבדלים בין נאמנויות משפטיות, עורך דין לסכסוכי נאמנות, סעדים מן היושר בירושה.
3. השבת כספי ביטוח חיים שנגנבו (Life Insurance Fraud)
   • מילות מפתח: הונאת מוטבים בביטוח, עורך דין הפרת חובת נאמנות, תביעה להשבת כספי ביטוח.
4. זכויות רכוש לידועים בציבור (Marvin Actions)
   • מילות מפתח: תביעת מרווין קליפורניה, זכויות רכוש לבני זוג לא נשואים, עורך דין לענייני רכוש סן דייגו.
5. הוכחת עשיית עושר ולא במשפט (Unjust Enrichment)
   • מילות מפתח: יסודות עשיית עושר קליפורניה, סעיף 16420 לקוד הירושה, פיצויים על ניצול כלכלי של קשישים.
6. מעקב פורנזי אחר נכסים מוברחים (Asset Tracing)
   • מילות מפתח: איתור נכסים סן דייגו, עורך דין ציות תאגידי קליפורניה, השבת כספים מעורבבים.
7. רישום הערת אזהרה: הקפאת נכסים (Lis Pendens)
   • מילות מפתח: הקפאת מכירת בית בהליך משפטי, בית המשפט המחוזי בסן דייגו, הודעה על תביעה תלויה ועומדת.
8. זכות עמידה ליורשים על פי דין (Hamlin Ruling)
   • מילות מפתח: פסק דין המלין קליפורניה, עורך דין גזל נכסים וזיוף שטרי מכר, ערעור על תיקון נאמנות במרמה.
9. הפרת יחסי אמון וניצול השפעה (Confidential Relationships)
   • מילות מפתח: עורך דין כשירות משפטית סן דייגו, הפרת אמון משפחתית, השפעה בלתי הוגנת בנאמנות.
10. ביטול העברות מרמה וזיוף (Fraudulent Transfers)
    • מילות מפתח: עורך דין הונאה בחתימה קליפורניה, ביטול העברת בעלות במקרקעין, ליטיגציה על זיוף מסמכים.