Can you sue the City of San Diego? It’s a question residents ask every time a sidewalk cracks, a pipe bursts, or a local policy feels profoundly unfair. The short answer is yes, but the path to holding a municipality accountable is rarely a straight line. It requires navigating a complex web of laws specifically designed to protect public entities.
To truly understand how municipal liability works in San Diego—and the massive potential consequences when a city fails in its duties—we need to look at a landmark case: De Anza Cove HOA v. City of San Diego. This wasn’t just a dispute over potholes; it was an 11-year legal war that resulted in a staggering $32 million judgment against the City .
Key Takeaways
- You can sue the City of San Diego under municipal liability laws, but the process is complex.
- The De Anza Cove case highlights municipal liability when the city failed to follow relocation laws, resulting in a $32 million judgment.
- California’s Government Code Section 835 holds public entities liable for injuries caused by dangerous conditions on their property.
- To win a municipal liability case, you must prove elements like public property, a dangerous condition, and the city’s notice of the issue.
- If injured, document everything, seek medical attention, and file an administrative claim with the city within six months.
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
The De Anza Cove Example: When a City Becomes the Adversary
To understand municipal liability, you have to look beyond trip-and-falls and look at systemic failure. The De Anza Cove Mobile Home Park, situated on prime real estate in Mission Bay, became the battleground for one of the most significant class-action lawsuits in San Diego history .
The City of San Diego owned and operated this mobile home park. When the land lease expired in 2003, the City decided to close the park and evict all the homeowners. However, California’s Mobilehome Residency Law (MRL) isn’t designed to let landowners—even government ones—simply kick people out. It requires the landowner to mitigate the impact by helping residents relocate .
Instead of following the law, the city initially offered residents roughly $4,000 per home to move. When the residents, represented by their homeowners association, pointed to the law requiring fair relocation assistance, the City dug in. But the liability didn’t stop there. According to court documents and news reports, the City and its hired management company allegedly engaged in a campaign of harassment to force residents out. This included:
- Tearing down storage areas, a market, a playground, and laundry facilities.
- Removing furniture and amenities from common areas.
- Installing glaring klieg lights and barbed wire fencing at the entrance.
- Towing vehicles without proper notice .
The court ultimately certified the case as a class action. After a successful trial, the judgment against the City was valued at $32 million. Instead of the paltry $4,000 offer, the court-ordered judgment resulted in an average payout of over $75,000 per home . This case serves as a stark reminder that municipal liability extends far beyond physical property defects; it encompasses how the city administers its own laws and treats its citizens.
Understanding the Legal Framework: Government Code Section 835
So, on a more day-to-day level, what legally constitutes a situation where you can hold the city liable? In California, the primary path to holding a public entity responsible for an injury is through Government Code Section 835. This statute makes a public entity liable for injury caused by a “dangerous condition” of its property .
To win a case like this, you generally have to prove five key elements:
- Public Property: The injury occurred on government-owned property.
- Dangerous Condition: The property was in a condition that created a substantial risk of injury when used with due care in a reasonably foreseeable manner . It can’t be a “trivial” defect.
- Injury: You suffered actual harm.
- Causation: The dangerous condition was the direct cause of your injury.
- Notice or Creation: This is the trickiest part. You must prove either:
- A city employee’s negligence created the dangerous condition, or
- The city had actual or constructive notice of the condition far enough in advance to fix it, yet failed to act .
The “Dangerous Condition” vs. “Trivial Defect” Distinction
One of the biggest hurdles in municipal liability cases is the “trivial defect” rule. Cities are not insurers of perfectly flat sidewalks. They are protected from liability for minor, trivial imperfections. For example, in Liss v. City of San Diego, a woman tripped on a sidewalk where a water meter cover was raised between one-half inch and one and one-half inches. The trial court initially threw out the case, ruling the defect was “trivial as a matter of law,” although this ruling was later reversed on appeal .
The lesson here is that context matters. A court will look at factors like the size of the defect, whether there were distracting circumstances (like a car backing out of a driveway), and whether the area was well-lit .
Proving the City Knew: The Burden of Notice
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of suing a municipality is proving they knew about the danger. The law recognizes two types of notice:
- Actual Notice: Someone reported it. A complaint was filed with the city’s Risk Management Department, a 311 call was made, or a city worker saw the issue and wrote a report .
- Constructive Notice: The condition was so obvious and had existed for so long that the city should have known about it. If a dangerous pothole has been in a crosswalk for six months, the city has a responsibility to discover and fix it .
In the De Anza Cove case, the “notice” was undeniable. The City wasn’t just aware of the dangerous living conditions it was creating; it was actively directing them. The City Council and management companies were the ones issuing the orders to install barbed wire and remove amenities, eliminating any doubt about their knowledge and liability .
Practical Steps: What to Do If You’re Injured
If you believe you have a claim against the City of San Diego, time is not on your side. You cannot simply file a lawsuit. You must first file an administrative claim with the city, usually within six months of the incident .
Here is the process you need to follow:
- Document Everything: Take photos of the condition, your injuries, and the surrounding area. Get contact information from any witnesses.
- Seek Medical Attention: Your health is the priority, and medical records serve as crucial evidence of your damages.
- File a Government Claim: You must file a claim with the City of San Diego Risk Management Department. As of December 2023, the city prefers you use their online claims portal, though paper forms (RM-9) are still accepted .
- Wait for a Response: The city has 45 days to accept or reject your claim. If they reject it, or if they fail to act within that time frame, you then have a limited window (usually six months) to file a lawsuit in superior court .
The De Anza Cove case is a monumental example of municipal liability because it shows the sheer scale of damages a city can face when it ignores the law. For most people, the stakes are smaller but no less personal—a broken ankle from a neglected sidewalk, or a flooded home from a burst water main.
If you’re facing a situation where the city’s negligence has harmed you, remember the residents of De Anza Cove. They stood their ground against a city that initially offered them pennies, and they won. Their victory didn’t just secure them fair compensation; it sent a clear message about the standards to which we hold our public entities.
More Resources:
California Legislative Information (.gov)
American Legal Publishing (Official Code Host)
For more information
👉 https://lbatlaw.com/
Schedule a Consultation:
Confused about what documents you actually need? Schedule a 20-minute California estate planning review with our firm.
📞 6194367544
📧 Info@lbatlaw.com
About Leeran S. Barzilai Law:
We focus on California-specific estate planning that actually works when families need it most. Our documents are drafted with local court requirements and real-world scenarios in mind.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS:
AI-Generated Content Disclosure: The core legal information is based on California law, but the presentation and structure were AI-enhanced for educational clarity.
Legal Disclaimer: This video is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with a qualified California attorney licensed in your state for advice on your specific legal situation. Laws and procedures change, and your individual circumstances require personalized counsel.
No comment